IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/smcjnl/v9y2021i2p58-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Media, Populism, and COVID-19: Weibo Users’ Reactions to Anti-Chinese Discourse

Author

Listed:
  • Theresa Catalano
  • Peiwen Wang

Abstract

US government communication about the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly the ‘Chinese virus’ discourse adopted by Donald Trump and his administration, has led to real-world violence and triggered heated discussions across social media sites, including Sina Weibo (aka Chinese Twitter). The current study explores the relationship between populism and social media by examining how Sina Weibo users respond to Trump’s communication on the virus. Employing multimodal critical discourse analysis, we examine both visual and verbal strategies used to build counter-discourses that challenge the use of terms such as ‘Chinese virus’. Findings demonstrate the potential of Weibo as a platform of resistance and site where users contest social injustice and racism, but also as a dangerous space in which populist discourses can yield more populist discourses which influence public sentiment and potentially government policies and international relations.

Suggested Citation

  • Theresa Catalano & Peiwen Wang, 2021. "Social Media, Populism, and COVID-19: Weibo Users’ Reactions to Anti-Chinese Discourse," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 9(2), pages 58-70, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:58-70
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/download/5388/5595
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/5388
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:9:y:2021:i:2:p:58-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.