IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/smcjnl/v5y2017i1p42-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Dissemination Rule of Public Opinion from SNA Perspective: Taking the Vaccine Safety Event as an Example

Author

Listed:
  • Jia Wang
  • Mengyao Guo
  • Li Zhang
  • Lujie Chen
  • Xiaorong Hou

Abstract

With the rapid development of social media, the dissemination of health information has attracted more attention from people. To reveal the rule and mode of information diffusion path is the key to effective crisis prevention and control of information. In this paper, the team took the vaccine safety events as an example, selected and analyzed two hottest microblogs from each phase of one event. The team did visual analysis via Zhiwei which was one academic micro data analysis platform, and utilized social network analysis (SNA) to explore the propagating rules of public opinion.

Suggested Citation

  • Jia Wang & Mengyao Guo & Li Zhang & Lujie Chen & Xiaorong Hou, 2017. "Research on Dissemination Rule of Public Opinion from SNA Perspective: Taking the Vaccine Safety Event as an Example," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 5(1), pages 42-49, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:5:y:2017:i:1:p:42-49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/2039/2397
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/2039
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    vaccine event; social network analysis; microblog; public opinion; dissemination;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:5:y:2017:i:1:p:42-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.