IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/smcjnl/v2y2014i2p82-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stem Cells between Ethics and Entrepreneurship: How a Contested Bio-Object Became ¡®Normal¡¯

Author

Listed:
  • Malin Ideland

Abstract

Human Embryonic Stem Cell (hESC) research has been described by many scholars as a controversial issue. However, in Swedish media reporting, hESC research is no longer described as contested. The aim of this paper is to explore how this research field has been normalized through discursive shifts which have had effects in terms of the lack of debate around novel biotechnologies. The article compares the reporting of Swedish newspapers on hESC research during year 2001 and onwards. The reason for this selection is that during 2001 there was a heated debate around hESC. After that point, media reporting is characterized by a lack of debate. Therefore, Swedish media reporting makes an interesting case for understanding how an ethical controversy can end. To conceptualize the contemporary lack of media reporting and debate, this paper analyzes discourses operating in news media reports during and after 2001 through studying how different researcher/subject positions and hESC bio-identities are articulated during different times, and how these open up for different issues to be, or not to be, reported and discussed. Laclau and Mouffe¡¯s discourse theory, as well as a theoretical framework of bio-objectification inspire the analysis. The result shows how ethical and political discourses about hESC in the Swedish news media have been replaced with engineering and economical discourses. The main point is that this new discursive formation has closed opportunities for oppositional ways of talking about hESC research, for example, as an ethical issue or an area for political debate and legislation. Instead, scientific-technological-therapeutic progress has been bound to a belief in economic progress. The final part of this article discusses how this discursive change can be understood in the perspective of changing relations between the public and academia, but also how dissolving positions can open up hegemonic discourses and challenge fixed meanings.

Suggested Citation

  • Malin Ideland, 2014. "Stem Cells between Ethics and Entrepreneurship: How a Contested Bio-Object Became ¡®Normal¡¯," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 82-92, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:2:y:2014:i:2:p:82-92
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/484/514
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/484
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    human embryonic stem cells; discourse analysis; bio-identity; researcher/subject positions; discourse analysis; post-academic science; media;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:2:y:2014:i:2:p:82-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.