IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/smcjnl/v2y2014i1p102-114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uses of Social Media among Selected Labour Unions in Abuja during Nigeria¡¯s (January 2012) ¡°Oil Subsidy¡± Removal Protests

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Aondo-verr Kombol

Abstract

The removal of oil subsidy in Nigeria (January 2012) sparked protests across the country and a nationwide strike action organised by the Nigerian Labour Congress (NLC). This study examines the role of social media during these protests. This study ascertains why people in Nigeria used social media during the protests instead of other pre-existing media- radio, television, newspapers, magazines, etc. Furthermore, it identifies the purposes for which social media was used (and by whom) during the protest whether intended or otherwise. For instance, in what ways can social media influence public opinion/mobilise people and groups to protest? Using a survey the study finds that: social media was used during these protests because restrictions in other media stifle expressions of individual opinion in the public sphere. A significant percentage of the opinion expressed via social media during these protests was of frustration due to mismanagement and corruption by the Nigerian government. Pictures, factual/statistical evidence and intelligent analysis of issues were a persuasive force on social media which shaped public opinion and mobilised people to go out on the streets.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Aondo-verr Kombol, 2014. "Uses of Social Media among Selected Labour Unions in Abuja during Nigeria¡¯s (January 2012) ¡°Oil Subsidy¡± Removal Protests," Studies in Media and Communication, Redfame publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 102-114, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:2:y:2014:i:1:p:102-114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/401/355
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/smc/article/view/401
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    social media; subsidy; oil; protest; labour union;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:smcjnl:v:2:y:2014:i:1:p:102-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.