IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/journl/v6y2018i12p22-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender and Age Differences in Safety-Oriented Personality Style or Phobicentric Psychopathology (SOPS/PCP)

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Bickersteth
  • Xinxin, Zhang
  • Xiaozhou Zhang

Abstract

This study investigates differences in gender and age in the Safety-Oriented Personality Style or Phobicentric Psychopathology (SOPS/PCP). Comparisons are made with Neuroticism in the Big 5 or Five Factor Model to further distinguish it from SOPS/PCP. The results show similarity in age but not gender differences between the two constructs. Also, the location of the participants (Canada or USA) was not significant. The study is an initial step in accumulating basic facts about SOPS/PCP.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Bickersteth & Xinxin, Zhang & Xiaozhou Zhang, 2018. "Gender and Age Differences in Safety-Oriented Personality Style or Phobicentric Psychopathology (SOPS/PCP)," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 6(12), pages 22-31, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:6:y:2018:i:12:p:22-31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/3703/3939
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/3703
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Big 5 Neuroticism; five factor model; plaster; continuous change;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:6:y:2018:i:12:p:22-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.