IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/journl/v5y2017i10p52-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Traders as Diplomats: Trade and Sino-American Rapprochement, 1971-78

Author

Listed:
  • Mao Lin

Abstract

During the 1970s, U.S.-China relations went through a major strategic transformation. To oppose their common enemy, the Soviet Union, the two countries ended hostilities which lasted for more than two decades and became Cold War allies. Many scholars have discussed this major historic turning point, however, most scholars have focused exclusively on the strategic relations between the two countries, while ignoring bilateral economic and trade relations. This paper argues that trade relations actually constituted an important aspect of American foreign policy towards China. And the development of trade relations in the 1970s was mainly promoted by American businessmen. These American businessmen not only hoped to open the Chinese market, but also consciously regarded themselves as “unofficial ambassadors”, because they believed that trade will contribute to the improvement of the relations between the two countries. By developing trade with China, the United States expected to transform China into a market-oriented economy, and eventually change the political nature of the Chinese regime.

Suggested Citation

  • Mao Lin, 2017. "Traders as Diplomats: Trade and Sino-American Rapprochement, 1971-78," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 5(10), pages 52-66, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:5:y:2017:i:10:p:52-66
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/2670/2827
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/2670
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    U.S.-China Relations; U.S.-China Trade; Cold War; modernization;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:5:y:2017:i:10:p:52-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.