IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/journl/v4y2016i2p17-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Management in an Electricity Transmission Project between Iceland and the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Daisuke Sasaki
  • Mikiyasu Nakayama

Abstract

In recent years, energy is transmitted in the form of electricity in some parts of the world. Furthermore, all member states of the European Union (EU) have a legal obligation to ensure that 20% of their community energy consumption comes from renewable sources by 2020. Therefore, there is a great demand for electricity derived from renewable sources while at the same time there are non-negligible risks in electricity transmission between nations. Addressing these risks is thus of great importance. Under such circumstances, the national power company in Iceland is investigating the possibility of installing a series of 800¨C1,200 MW high-voltage direct current (HVDC) submarine power cables of over a span of 1,000 km in an effort to deliver more than 5 TWh of renewable electricity to the UK each year. In order to accelerate this project, the company must employ measures of risk prevention and/or mitigation. This study aims at revealing the potential risks of this project (called IceLink) using qualitative analysis. Thus far, there seems to be very few similar studies concerning the project, yet the results are significant from the viewpoint of risk management. Based on the results of interviews and a survey of the literature, we identify three major potential risks of the project: regulatory risk, political risk, and financial risk. In this regard, we classify risk in the same manner as a previous research. Subsequently, we suggest ways to manage these risks and as a result, we find that many of these measures can be introduced even under the present circumstances.

Suggested Citation

  • Daisuke Sasaki & Mikiyasu Nakayama, 2016. "Risk Management in an Electricity Transmission Project between Iceland and the UK," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 4(2), pages 17-23, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:17-23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/1209/1242
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/1209
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhuola Zhang & Shiyuan Lin & Yingjin Ye & Zhao Xu & Yihang Zhao & Huiru Zhao & Jingqi Sun, 2022. "A Hybrid MCDM Model for Evaluating the Market-Oriented Business Regulatory Risk of Power Grid Enterprises Based on the Bayesian Best-Worst Method and MARCOS Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Wenjin Li & Bingkang Li & Rengcun Fang & Peipei You & Yuxin Zou & Zhao Xu & Sen Guo, 2021. "Risk Evaluation of Electric Power Grid Enterprise Related to Electricity Transmission and Distribution Tariff Regulation Employing a Hybrid MCDM Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-23, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    risk management; renewable energy; electricity transmission; feed-in tariff; financing instrument; IceLink;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:17-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.