IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/journl/v4y2016i2p1-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pak-China Boundary Agreement: Factors and Indian Reactions

Author

Listed:
  • Manzoor Khan Afridi
  • Abdul Zahoor Khan

Abstract

Aim of the paper is to discuss the Sino-Pakistan boundary agreement and to analyze the factors responsible. In 1960, Pakistan put forward its offer to China for border demarcation. The Chinese Government did not respond to the Pakistani offer. China was working hard to persuade India for the border settlement. But when the hopes for the Sino-Indian rapprochement failed, China asserted for negotiations with Pakistan. China was also motivated by the concept that the Western powers might manipulate the situation between the two countries and could assert pressure on Pakistan¡¯s decision making process which would bring hostilities between the two countries. If China would more delay its border negotiations with Pakistan, the US wishes might come true and a permanent stalemate in relations could persist in future. As long as Pakistan was dependent on the US for its military and economic needs, it seemed difficult to get closer with China and negotiate for a border demarcation. Despite the opposition of India and the US, both Pakistan and China demarcated their border and signed a boundary agreement.

Suggested Citation

  • Manzoor Khan Afridi & Abdul Zahoor Khan, 2016. "Pak-China Boundary Agreement: Factors and Indian Reactions," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 4(2), pages 1-5, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:1-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/1296/1259
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/ijsss/article/view/1296
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Pakistan; China; Boundary; Kashmir; Xinjiang; India;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:journl:v:4:y:2016:i:2:p:1-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.