IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/bmsjnl/v1y2015i2p127-133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing the Correlation between Gender Traits and the Perception of Effective Leadership

Author

Listed:
  • Phillip Neely, Jr.
  • Ray Muhammad

Abstract

As the percentage of women managers has risen in the workforce, so have questions of whether women could effectively manage corporations. This curiosity has yielded studies designed to analyze the correlation between gender and management. Additionally, the research has led to contrary views from one research project to another. In their article, Leadership, Education and Gender Roles: Think Manager, Think ¡°?¡±, Coder and Spiller (2013) reviewed three varying trains of thought from the 1970s through the 1990s to examine how various shortcomings in methodology might impact comprehension and remediation of gender issues and management. The article reviews research that appears to substantiate that when people think manager, they think male. This is followed by data, which suggests that when people think research, we think female and finally research endorsing the train of thought that when people think manager, there is no gender specific thought. Two Indexes developed in the 1970s greatly impacted gender and its correlation to management traits. These were the Schein Descriptive Index (SDI) and the BEM Sex Role Index (BSRI). According Coder and Spiller (20113) results of the Schein Descriptive Index, a test developed by Virginia Schein, indicated the characteristics of women managers more closely resembled males than females.

Suggested Citation

  • Phillip Neely, Jr. & Ray Muhammad, 2015. "Analyzing the Correlation between Gender Traits and the Perception of Effective Leadership," Business and Management Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 1(2), pages 127-133, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:bmsjnl:v:1:y:2015:i:2:p:127-133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/bms/article/view/981/919
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/bms/article/view/981
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:bmsjnl:v:1:y:2015:i:2:p:127-133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.