IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/bmsjnl/v1y2015i2p106-114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-interest and Altruism: Pluralism as a Basis for Leadership in Business

Author

Listed:
  • Jay Joseph

Abstract

The paper outlines the case for pluralism between self-interest (egoism) and altruism in business leadership. Scientific progression demonstrating pluralism is discussed, providing a multidisciplinary view of pluralism from evolutionary biology, psychology, moral philosophy, economic theory and organisational behavior. Findings show that myopic views of self-interest and altruism were once dominant in a number of fields however shifts in contemporary theory have provided a basis for pluralism in business leadership. Pluralism is yet to find grounding in leadership ethics, which still widely views ¡°good leadership¡± through the lens of altruistic orientations. For leaders in business, the relevance of both self-interest and altruistic orientations are described. The paper seeks to address the divide between self-interest and altruism for business leaders, advocating for a realistic and pragmatic pluralistic approach to guide future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Jay Joseph, 2015. "Self-interest and Altruism: Pluralism as a Basis for Leadership in Business," Business and Management Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 1(2), pages 106-114, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:bmsjnl:v:1:y:2015:i:2:p:106-114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/bms/article/view/921/873
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/bms/article/view/921
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmed Mohammed Sayed Mostafa & Paul A. Bottomley, 2020. "Self-Sacrificial Leadership and Employee Behaviours: An Examination of the Role of Organizational Social Capital," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(3), pages 641-652, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:bmsjnl:v:1:y:2015:i:2:p:106-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.