IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/aefjnl/v7y2020i4p169-174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Fiscal Decentralization Financial Performance Against Local And Regional Gross Domestic Product (GDP) NTB

Author

Listed:
  • M Amin

Abstract

This study aims to empirically prove the effect of Fiscal Decentralization on regional financial performance, the effect of fiscal decentralization on Gross Regional Domestic Product and the effect of Regional Financial Performance on Gross Regional Domestic Product. This study uses secondary data taken from 10 districts/cities in West Nusa Tenggara Province. The results of this study indicate that H1 Fiscal Decentralization has significant and significant influence on regional financial performance. H2 turns out that the Fiscal Decentralization variable does not significantly influence the Gross Regional Domestic Product. H3 Regional Financial Performance does not significantly influence Gross Regional Domestic Product.

Suggested Citation

  • M Amin, 2020. "Effect of Fiscal Decentralization Financial Performance Against Local And Regional Gross Domestic Product (GDP) NTB," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 7(4), pages 169-174, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:aefjnl:v:7:y:2020:i:4:p:169-174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/aef/article/download/4921/5100
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/aef/article/view/4921
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timothy Smeeding & Irwin Garfinkel & Lee Rainwater, 2005. "Welfare State Expenditures and the Redistribution of Well-Being: Children, Elders, and Others in Comparative Perspective," LIS Working papers 387, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tess Penne & Irene Cussó Parcerisas & Lauri Mäkinen & Bérénice Storms & Tim Goedemé, 2016. "Can reference budgets be used as a poverty line?," ImPRovE Working Papers 16/05, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    2. Heisz, Andrew, 2007. "Inegalite et redistribution du revenu au Canada : 1976 a 2004," Direction des études analytiques : documents de recherche 2007298f, Statistics Canada, Direction des études analytiques.
    3. Ursula Dallinger, 2011. "The Endangered Middle Class? A Comparative Analysis of the Role Public Redistribution Plays," LIS Working papers 565, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    4. Thomas DiPrete & Ellen Verbakel, 2007. "The Value of Non-Working Time Incorporated in Quality of Life Comparisons: The Case of the U.S. vs. the Netherlands," LIS Working papers 464, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    5. Daniela Sonedda & Gilberto Turati, 2005. "Winners and Losers in the Italian Welfare State: A Microsimulation Analysis of Income Redistribution Considering In-Kind Transfers," Giornale degli Economisti, GDE (Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia), Bocconi University, vol. 64(4), pages 423-464, December.
    6. Timothy Smeeding & Teresa Munzi, 2017. "Conditions of Social Vulnerability, Work and Low Income, Evidence for Spain in Comparative Perspective," LIS Working papers 448, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    7. Charlotte Cavaill, 2015. "Deservingness, Self-Interest and the Welfare State: Why Some Care More about Deservingness than Others and Why It Matters," LIS Working papers 652, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    8. Timothy Smeeding & Teresa Munzi, 2005. "Poverty and Inequality: Greece and Mediterranean Europe in Comparative Perspective," LIS Working papers 421, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    9. Heisz, Andrew, 2007. "Income Inequality and Redistribution in Canada: 1976 to 2004," Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series 2007298e, Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:aefjnl:v:7:y:2020:i:4:p:169-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.