IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/aefjnl/v2y2015i2p23-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fallacies of Risk Control

Author

Listed:
  • Jurgen Vandenbroucke

Abstract

This paper demonstrates how risk control as applied to popular investment products can be based on a fallacy. In scope are option-based capital protected products and rules-based portfolio insurance products. In case of structured products risk control shifts the option¡¯s volatility risk from the product provider to the end investor. The investor is presented a different product, for better or for worse, and not an improved version of the ¡°base¡± product. Adding risk control to the risky asset of portfolio insurance leaves the portfolio allocation unchanged if, for good reasons, market exposure is already inversely linked to volatility. The investor receives nothing else but the ¡°base¡± product, be it in a commercially more appealing presentation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jurgen Vandenbroucke, 2015. "Fallacies of Risk Control," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 23-28, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:rfa:aefjnl:v:2:y:2015:i:2:p:23-28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/aef/article/view/716/659
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://redfame.com/journal/index.php/aef/article/view/716
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raquel M. Gaspar & Paulo M. Silva, 2019. "Investors’ Perspective on Portfolio InsuranceExpected Utility vs Prospect Theories," Working Papers REM 2019/92, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, REM, Universidade de Lisboa.
    2. Ine Marquet & Wim Schoutens, 2018. "CONIC CPPIs," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(02), pages 1-20, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    risk control; volatility; structured products; portfolio insurance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:aefjnl:v:2:y:2015:i:2:p:23-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.