IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rej/journl/v18y2015i58p3-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Controversy of Corporate Social Responsibility: What Is Best For Business

Author

Listed:
  • Victor Danciu

Abstract

The Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is the subject of permanent theoretical debates and the constant object of a company's business practices but also of some controversy. This makes it necessary to bring some valid arguments to support the growing role of CSR in the company' s efforts to achieve its objectives. This article aims to contribute to a better understanding of CSR issues and how it may help by better meeting the demands of society. It begins with a brief overview of the phenomenon of social irresponsibility which is justifying a better understanding of CSR issues. Therefore, the second part deals with the concept and the improved content of CSR which includes an author’s proposal of a new updated structure of the CSR content and ends with the presentation of its potential contribution to the company's performance and to better satisfy the demands of society. The conclusions highlight the main ideas and arguments of the article. At first, they present the arguments in favor of CSR that are justified by the changes in contemporary society and then the ones which stems from the fact that the companies are members of the society. The article has as support the idea of Riley (2012) who argues that "ignoring CSR potentially damage stakeholders, embracing CSR creates value".

Suggested Citation

  • Victor Danciu, 2015. "The Controversy of Corporate Social Responsibility: What Is Best For Business," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 18(58), pages 3-26, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:rej:journl:v:18:y:2015:i:58:p:3-26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rejournal.eu/sites/rejournal.versatech.ro/files/articole/2015-12-26/3312/1danciu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    corporate social responsibility; Corporate Social Irresponsibility; CSR pyramid; CSR contribution;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
    • Q20 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - General
    • Q30 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation - - - General
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rej:journl:v:18:y:2015:i:58:p:3-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Radu Lupu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/frasero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.