IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijfbss/v2y2013i4p45-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fiscally Unsustainable Social Welfare, UntenableHousing Solutions and the Mortgage Default Ratioin South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Vuyisani Moss

    (Research Analyst at the National Housing Finance Corporation (NHFC) in Johannesburg, South Africa)

Abstract

This article reflects on social welfare systemand governance of housing markets from an end-user perspective. The article critically analyses the way in which social welfare has correlated to unsustainable development and created self entitlement behaviours and attitudes in the South African low income housing market. The phenomenon was demonstrable by empirical research whose findings confirmed an existence of an association between a fully subsidized social housing model (as underpinned by South Africa’ssocial welfare)and propensity to default onmortgages. The study found that the risk of default by homeowners inthe low income housing market in South Africa is influenced by government’shousing grant model. In other words, the research established that the principle of servicing a mortgaged starter property (that is almost similar to a government free house bybothstructure and design)is not universally accepted byhomeowners of thesemortgaged houses. The unintended consequences are that the system has created indefinite expectations that potentially could; (i) erode the country’s balance sheet; (ii) add to non-payment behaviour; (iii) pressurize the economic and credit systems;(iv) propagate entitlement attitudes and mindsets;(v) create social instability and (v) widenedthe country’s balance of payment deficits.

Suggested Citation

  • Vuyisani Moss, 2013. "Fiscally Unsustainable Social Welfare, UntenableHousing Solutions and the Mortgage Default Ratioin South Africa," International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 2(4), pages 45-59, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijfbss:v:2:y:2013:i:4:p:45-59
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijfbs/article/view/415/368
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijfbs/article/view/415
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijfbss:v:2:y:2013:i:4:p:45-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hasan Dincer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.