Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

The Limitations of Using the Existing TAM in Adoption of Clinical Decision Support System in Hospitals: An Empirical Study in Malaysia

Contents:

Author Info

  • Pouyan Esmaeilzadeh

    (Graduate School of Management, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Putra, Malaysia)

  • Murali Sambasivan

    (Taylor's Business School, Taylor's University Lakeside Campus, Subang Jaya, Malaysia)

  • Hossein Nezakati

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Putra, Malaysia)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    The technology acceptance model (TAM) has been widely used to study user acceptance of new computer technologies. Previous studies claimed that future technology acceptance research should explore other additional explanatory variables, which may affect the originally proposed constructs of the TAM. The use of information technology in the health care sector and especially in hospitals offers great potential for improving the performance of physicians, increasing the quality of services and also reducing the organizational expenses. However, the main challenge that arises according to the literature is whether healthcare professionals are willing to adopt and use clinical information technology while performing their tasks. Although adoption of various information technologies has been studied using the technology acceptance model (TAM), the study of technology acceptance for professional groups (such as physicians) has been limited. Physician adoption of clinical information technology is important for its successful implementation. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to gain a better insight about factors affecting physicians’ acceptance of clinical decision support systems (CDSS) in a hospital setting. The results reflect the importance of perceived threat to professional autonomy, perceived interactivity with clinical IT, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in determining physicians’ intention to use CDSS.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/319/192/319-815-1-PB.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/319/192
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Society for the Study of Business & Finance in its journal International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science.

    Volume (Year): 3 (2014)
    Issue (Month): 2 (April)
    Pages: 56-68

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:3:y:2014:i:2:p:56-68

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Beylikduzu Yerleskesi Beykent, Buyukcekmece-Istanbul, Turkey
    Phone: +90 – 444-1-997 / (5307 or 5482)
    Fax: +90 0212 867 55 66
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.ssbfnet.com/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: Perceived threat to professional autonomy; level of interactivity; perceived usefulness; perceived ease of use; Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS); TAM;

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:3:y:2014:i:2:p:56-68. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Senol Emir).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.