IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rau/journl/v6y2012i1p74-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trial Incidents Regarding The Admissibility Of Electronic Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • George Măgureanu

    (The Faculty of law, within The Romanian-American University, Romania)

Abstract

The general objective of this paper is a topic of present interest, taking into consideration the need to use the evidence in civil and criminal national and international lawsuits, if electronic means are used, because they are more reliable in comparison to the traditional procedures. The culpability or non culpability of a person or the existence or not of a subjective right, cannot be established, without our relying on verdicts according to the evidence and the means of evidence, otherwise the risk to make frauds, to give wrong verdicts, that infringe the rights and liberties of the person become very high. According to a documentary research, this paper identifies methods and means to eliminate the incidents that appear while administering and giving the evidence according to electronic means, that can be easily altered. Presenting the conclusions we have reached after our research, we believe we identified efficient means to apply to a greater extent the national legal provisions and the European directives, to harmonise the national legislation with the European Union legislation, which contribute to the protection and obedience of the human rights, in the investigated cases, while the electronic evidence is given.

Suggested Citation

  • George Măgureanu, 2012. "Trial Incidents Regarding The Admissibility Of Electronic Evidence," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 6(1), pages 74-86, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:6:y:2012:i:1:p:74-86
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rebe.rau.ro/RePEc/rau/jisomg/SP12/JISOM-SP12-A8.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:6:y:2012:i:1:p:74-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alex Tabusca (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/firauro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.