IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rau/journl/v11y2016i4.1p25-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conflict – The Source Of Progress Or Regress In Modern Organizations?

Author

Listed:
  • Elisabeta Andreea BUDACIA

    (Romanian-American University, Bucharest)

Abstract

Within an organization, the system of relations is based on collaboration, but also on conflict. While cooperation conditions the existence of the organization as a system, conflict ensures the dynamics of the system, but it can also be a source of progress. Conflict management within an organization is a current issue, primarily in the practical activity, but also on a theoretical level, with a view to finding solutions. Research has shown that managers spend between 20 and 50 % of their time trying to handle conflicts within the organization. In an organization there are people and groups that compete for influence and resources, there are differences of opinion, different interests and values, there are conflicts of priorities and goals. Thus, the concern is in what way does the conflict have positive effects and if the competition that it generates is a favourable element or not. The acceptance from the part of the manager of the reality according to which conflict is an inevitable presence in any organization represents an essential premise for its settlement, even for its transformation in a potential source for the development of the business.

Suggested Citation

  • Elisabeta Andreea BUDACIA, 2016. "Conflict – The Source Of Progress Or Regress In Modern Organizations?," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 11(4.1), pages 25-29, december.
  • Handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:11:y:2016:i:4.1:p:25-29
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rebe.rau.ro/RePEc/rau/journl/WI16S/REBE-WI16S-A3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rau:journl:v:11:y:2016:i:4.1:p:25-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alex Tabusca (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ferauro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.