Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Faut-il augmenter les droits d'inscription à l'université ?

Contents:

Author Info

  • Alain Trannoy
  • Robert Gary-Bobo

Abstract

[fre] Robert Gary-Bobo Alain Trannoy Faut-il augmenter les droits d'inscription à l'université ? Nous adoptons la perspective de pouvoirs publics cherchant à améliorer l'efficacité économique, sous la contrainte de ne pas rendre plus inéquitable l'accès à l'enseignement supérieur. A cette fin, nous proposons que tout jeune sortant de l'enseignement secondaire, qu'il (elle) entre ou non à l'université, puisse emprunter sans intérêt auprès de l'Etat une valeur approximative de 60 000 euros, représentant le coût direct total de cinq années de scolarité d'enseignement supérieur, sur la base d'un projet professionnel, et que les universités puissent fixer des droits d'inscription de l'ordre de 4 500 euros par an. Pour arriver à cette conclusion, nous proposons une discussion générale du financement des études supérieures du point de vue du principe d'égalité des chances et nous étudions, au préalable, les règles optimales d'admission des étudiants, sous l'hypothèse que les étudiants ne sont pas soumis à une contrainte d'endettement. Pour que les droits d'inscription soient pratiquement nuls à Y optimum social, comme dans l'université française actuelle, il faudrait que l'université ait une très fine connaissance des talents cognitifš de tous ceux qui se présentent à elle et que les étudiants admis soient vraiment ceux qui sont les plus capables de mettre à profit les connaissances dispensées, ce qui suppose une sélection à l'entrée. [eng] Should we Raise Tuition Fees ? The present article addresses the issue of higher education finance from the double point of view of efficiency and equality of opportunity. We assume that a decision-maker would like to improve efficiency, under the constraint that access to higher education is not made more inequitable. For this purpose, we propose that each young person leaving secondary education, whatever his or her plans to enter higher education, may benefit from a free loan of an amount of around 60 000 €, under the requirement of proposing a professional plan. This amount represents the direct cost of five years of studies at the university, which could then be allowed to raise tuition charges up to 4 500 € per year. Such a proposition is derived from an analysis, in which we pay attention to optimal student admission rules under the assumption that students are not facing a borrowing constraint. For free admission to be optimal, as it is the case in French universities, the higher education institution must have a very precise knowledge of the applicants' cognitive talents. This requires entrance examinations, in order to make sure that those who study are also those who benefit the most from higher education.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/rfeco.2005.1557
Download Restriction: no

File URL: http://www.persee.fr/articleAsPDF/rfeco_0769-0479_2005_num_19_3_1557/rfeco_0769-0479_2005_num_19_3_1557.pdf?mode=light
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Revue française d'économie.

Volume (Year): 19 (2005)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
Pages: 189-237

as in new window
Handle: RePEc:prs:rfreco:rfeco_0769-0479_2005_num_19_3_1557

Note: DOI:10.3406/rfeco.2005.1557
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/revue/rfeco

Related research

Keywords:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Hugo Harari-Kermadec & David Flacher, 2011. "Tuition fees, self-esteem and social heterogeneity," Post-Print hal-00566151, HAL.
  2. David Flacher & Hugo Harari-Kermadec & Léonard Moulin, 2013. "Financing higher education: a contributory scheme," Working Papers 2013/34, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
  3. Guilhem Lecouteux & Léonard Moulin, 2013. "From welfare to preferences, do decision flaws matter? The case of tuition fees," Working Papers hal-00807687, HAL.
  4. repec:hal:wpaper:hal-00870921 is not listed on IDEAS

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:rfreco:rfeco_0769-0479_2005_num_19_3_1557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.