IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/recind/rei_0154-3229_1997_num_79_1_1661.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Compromis institutionnels et hybridations entre recherche publique et recherche privée

Author

Listed:
  • Maurice Cassier

Abstract

[fre] Tandis que des travaux en économie de la science insistent sur la précarité des contrats de recherche entre l'université et l'industrie, en raison des asymétries d'information auxquelles ils sont soumis et de l'incompatibilité des systèmes d'incitation des deux types d'institutions, nous démontrons la possibilité d'établir des formules de compromis entre bien privé, bien collectif et bien public. Ce régime d'appropriation modérée, qui fait qu'une entreprise ne capte pas l'ensemble des résultats du contrat qu'elle finance, favorise le développement des stocks de connaissances et la croissance des externalités de la recherche. Plus généralement, l'organisation linéaire de la science et de la technologie, confinées dans des institutions séparées, cède le pas à des interactions récurrentes entre université et industrie, ainsi qu'à des intégrations verticales dans les différentes institutions. Dans ce contexte, les universités sont amenées à apprendre à utiliser les brevets comme des outils de réservation de leurs inventions et des outils de coordination avec les firmes. [eng] While studies in the economics of science emphasize the precariousness of research contracts between university and industry dues to asymetries of information and incompatibility of the incentive systems ofthe two types of institution, we show that it is possible to establish formulae of compromise between private goods, collective goods and public goods. This moderate appropriation regime, in which a firm does not capture all the results of a contract which it finances, favours the development of stocks of knowledge and the growth of research externalities. More generally the linear organization of science and technology, confined to separate institutions, is giving way to recurrent interaction between university and industry, as well as to vertical integration within the different institutions. In this context, universities have to learn to use patents as tools for protecting their inventions and co-ordinating their action with firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Maurice Cassier, 1997. "Compromis institutionnels et hybridations entre recherche publique et recherche privée," Revue d'Économie Industrielle, Programme National Persée, vol. 79(1), pages 191-212.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:recind:rei_0154-3229_1997_num_79_1_1661
    DOI: 10.3406/rei.1997.1661
    Note: DOI:10.3406/rei.1997.1661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/rei.1997.1661
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/rei_0154-3229_1997_num_79_1_1661
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/rei.1997.1661?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rachel Levy & Pascale Roux & Sandrine Wolff, 2005. "An analysis of science–industry collaborative patterns in a large European University," Post-Print hal-00279261, HAL.
    2. Rachel Levy & Pascale Roux & Sandrine Wolff, 2009. "An analysis of science–industry collaborative patterns in a large European University," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Carayol, Nicolas, 2003. "Objectives, agreements and matching in science-industry collaborations: reassembling the pieces of the puzzle," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 887-908, June.
    4. Leroux, Isabelle, 2000. "The Role Of Negotiation In The Structuring Of Territory: The Case Of Biotechnologies In Toulouse," ERSA conference papers ersa00p71, European Regional Science Association.
    5. Maurice Cassier & Dominique Foray, 1999. "La régulation de la propriété intellectuelle dans les consortiums de recherche : les types de solutions élaborées par les chercheurs," Post-Print halshs-01894081, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:recind:rei_0154-3229_1997_num_79_1_1661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/rei .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.