Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Monachisme féminin au pays de Liège à la fin du XVIIe siècle : une vie sub clausura perpetua ?

Contents:

Author Info

  • Marie-Elisabeth Henneau
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    [fre] Lorsque le prince-évêque de Liège Jean-Louis d'Elderen publie son édit en faveur du rétablissement d'une clôture stricte dans les monastères de femmes (1690), l'émotion est grande chez les cisterciennes, toujours installées dans les campagnes de son diocèse. Au cours des deux décennies suivantes, les moniales remuent ciel et terre pour faire entendre leur propre conception de la clôture, grâce aux interventions efficaces de divers réseaux, où relations familiales se conjuguent à l'habileté des canonistes pour incliner l'autorité épiscopale à se rendre à leurs arguments. Au même moment, d'autres religieuses proclament avec ferveur leur attachement à une stricte clôture, en dépit d'événements douloureux qui les contraignent parfois à quitter le cloître pour affronter le monde. La clôture la plus intransigeante y est revendiquée par les intéressées comme voie de salut et rempart protecteur de leur jardin clos. La confrontation de deux discours féminins contemporains, eux-mêmes mis en regard des avis souvent divergents des autorités masculines, révèle l'intensité des débats au sujet d'un article de discipline, présenté par les uns comme condition sine qua non du bon fonctionnement d'un couvent de femmes et de sa réputation aux yeux du monde, et ressenti par d'autres comme composante d'une règle monastique, certes utile, mais susceptible d'aménagements, en fonction des circonstances et des besoins individuels. [eng] When the Prince-Bishop of Liège, Jean-Louis d'Elderen, published his edict (1690) supporting the re-establishment of strict enclosure in womens monasteries, feelings ran high amongst the Cistercians sisters who were still living in the countryside surrounding the diocese. During the course of the following two decades, the cloistered nuns went to great lengths to make their own idea of enclosure heard, thanks to the effective intervention of various networks where familial relations and the persuasive efforts of canonists combined to persuade the Episcopal authorities to come round to their way of thinking. At the same time, other religious women fervently announced their attachment to a strict enclosure, in spite of certain unfortunate incidents which sometimes obliged them to leave the cloister and brave the outside world. The most uncompromising type of enclosure was therefore demanded by these women as a means of security and as a protective wall around their enclosed garden. The clash of two contemporary feminine discourses, both of them often considered to contradict those of masculine authorities, reveals the force of the debates around the topic of discipline, presented by some as a condition sine qua non of the good operation of a convent and of its reputation in the eyes of the rest of the world, and accepted by others as a component of monastic rule, undoubtedly useful, but also liable to revision according to circumstances and individual needs.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/hes.2005.2557
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.persee.fr/articleAsPDF/hes_0752-5702_2005_num_24_3_2557/hes_0752-5702_2005_num_24_3_2557.pdf?mode=light
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Histoire, économie et société.

    Volume (Year): 24 (2005)
    Issue (Month): 3 ()
    Pages: 387-398

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:prs:hiseco:hes_0752-5702_2005_num_24_3_2557

    Note: DOI:10.3406/hes.2005.2557
    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://www.persee.fr/web/revues/home/prescript/revue/hes

    Related research

    Keywords:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:hiseco:hes_0752-5702_2005_num_24_3_2557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.