IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/hiseco/hes_0752-5702_2000_num_19_2_2117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Natalité, fécondité et illégitimité en Anjou au XIXe siècle

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Louis Ormières

Abstract

[fre] Résumé La baisse rapide de la natalité en France a amené les historiens à en rechercher les causes essentielles. Il faut cependant préciser que ce déclin a varié d'une région à l'autre. Le cas de l'Anjou est un modèle de cette disparité. Comme la natalité, la fécondité et l'illégitimité révèlent un profond contraste entre l'est et l'ouest de la province. Une telle disparité permet d'examiner les liens entre comportement démographique et variables culturelles. Sur ce point le catholicisme semble avoir été le principal facteur à avoir joué un rôle non seulement en ce qui concerne la vitalité démographique. Une ferveur religieuse solide a en effet aussi permis le maintien de l'illégitimité à un niveau faible et inversement. [eng] Abstract The rapid decay of birth rate in France has led historians to research its main causes. However, it is necessary to state precisely that this decay varied from region to region. The case of Anjou is an exemplary of this disparity. As birth rate, fecundity and illegitimacy reveal a deep contrast between west and east of this province. Such a disparity allows to examine the links between demographic behaviour and cultural variables. In that respect Catholicism appears the main factor to have been in play not only as far as demographic vitality is concerned. A solid religious earnestness feeling has also permitted to maintain a low level of illegitimacy and reversely.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Louis Ormières, 2000. "Natalité, fécondité et illégitimité en Anjou au XIXe siècle," Histoire, économie & société, Programme National Persée, vol. 19(2), pages 235-252.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:hiseco:hes_0752-5702_2000_num_19_2_2117
    DOI: 10.3406/hes.2000.2117
    Note: DOI:10.3406/hes.2000.2117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/hes.2000.2117
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/hes_0752-5702_2000_num_19_2_2117
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/hes.2000.2117?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:hiseco:hes_0752-5702_2000_num_19_2_2117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/hes .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.