IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecstat/estat_0336-1454_2014_num_469_1_10416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EU‑Silc/SRCV, ambition et apport d’une approche longitudinale et transversale des revenus et des conditions de vie, en France et en Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Carine Burricand
  • Cédric Houdré
  • Louis‑André Vallet

Abstract

[fre] En consacrant ce numéro au dispositif EU‑Silc / SRCV, c’est‑à‑dire «European Union – Statistics on Income and Living Conditions / Statistiques sur les ressources et les conditions de vie » , Économie et Statistique renoue avec une pratique qui date déjà de 2001 où le numéro 349‑350 était centré dans son entier sur le Panel européen des ménages. EU‑Silc / SRCV s’inscrit en effet dans la montée en puissance, en France comme en Europe et depuis environ trois décennies, des dispositifs longitudinaux d’observation et de suivi des ménages en vue de mieux connaître et analyser les conditions de vie de ces derniers.

Suggested Citation

  • Carine Burricand & Cédric Houdré & Louis‑André Vallet, 2014. "EU‑Silc/SRCV, ambition et apport d’une approche longitudinale et transversale des revenus et des conditions de vie, en France et en Europe," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 469(1), pages 5-18.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_2014_num_469_1_10416
    DOI: 10.3406/estat.2014.10416
    Note: DOI:10.3406/estat.2014.10416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/estat.2014.10416
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/estat_0336-1454_2014_num_469_1_10416
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/estat.2014.10416?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dominique Meurs & Sophie Ponthieux, 2015. "Gender Inequality," Post-Print hal-01410766, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lamia Kandil & Hélène Perivier, 2017. "La division sexuée du travail dans les couples selon le statut marital en France - une étude à partir des enquêtes emploi du temps de 1985-1986, 1998-1999, et 2009-2010," Documents de Travail de l'OFCE 2017-03, Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE).
    2. Antoine Rebérioux & Gwenaël Roudaut, 2016. "Gender Quota inside the Boardroom: Female Directors as New Key Players?," Working Papers hal-01297884, HAL.
    3. Anthony B. Atkinson & Alessandra Casarico & Sarah Voitchovsky, 2018. "Top incomes and the gender divide," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 16(2), pages 225-256, June.
    4. Laurent Gobillon & Dominique Meurs & Sébastien Y. Roux, 2017. "Differences in positions along a hierarchy: Counterfactuals based on an assignment," PSE Working Papers halshs-01513012, HAL.
    5. Laurent Gobillon & Dominique Meurs & Sébastien Roux, 2022. "Differences in Positions along a Hierarchy: Counterfactuals Based on an Assignment Model," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 145, pages 29-74.
    6. Boschini, Anne & Gunnarsson, Kristin & Roine, Jesper, 2017. "Women in Top Incomes: Evidence from Sweden 1974–2013," IZA Discussion Papers 10979, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Aleksandra Parteka & Sabina Szymczak & Joanna Wolszczak-Derlacz, 2017. "Gender Wage Gap Convergence and Skills Heterogeneity in Poland (2005–2014) – Quantile Regression Analysis Based on Microdata from EU SILC," Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, issue 47, pages 129-142.
    8. Kai-Uwe Müller & Michael Neumann & Katharina Wrohlich, 2016. "The Family Working Time Model - Toward More Gender Equality in Work and Care," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1603, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    9. Simon Bittmann, 2015. "Ressources économiques des femmes et travail domestique des conjoints : quels effets pour quelles tâches ?," Post-Print hal-01309219, HAL.
    10. Mathieu Narcy & Joseph Lanfranchi & Chloé Duvivier, 2016. "Les sources de l’écart de rémunération entre femmes et hommes dans la fonction publique," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 488(1), pages 123-150.
    11. Lionel Wilner, 2016. "Worker-firm matching and the parenthood pay gap: Evidence from linked employer-employee data," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 29(4), pages 991-1023, October.
    12. Pierre-André Chiappori & Costas Meghir, 2014. "Intrahousehold Inequality," NBER Working Papers 20191, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Sophie Ponthieux, 2015. "Introduction. Les enquêtes Emploi du temps : une source majeure pour l'étude des inégalités sociales et de genre," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 478(1), pages 59-77.
    14. Lamia Kandil & Hélène Périvier, 2017. "La division sexuée du travail dans les couples selon le statut marital en France: Une étude à partir des enquêtes emploi du temps de 1985-1986, 1998-1999, et 2009-2010," Sciences Po publications 2017-03, Sciences Po.
    15. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/445bs70a2o9ufavlerqnopsvg1 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_2014_num_469_1_10416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/estat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.