IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/caecpo/cep_0154-8344_1996_num_27_1_1195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kaleidoscope of the Colonial Discussion

Author

Listed:
  • Hiroshi Mizuta

Abstract

[fre] Cet article a pour objet d'examiner les positions de Smith à l'égard des colonies américaines. . Dans une première partie, on étudie ses remarques, dans les Leçons de Jurisprudence et les Early Draft de la Richesse des Nations, à propos des indiens et des esclaves d'Amérique, ainsi que de la société coloniale. A partir de 1767 le conflit colonial occupe le centre des réflexions. On compare les positions de Smith et celle de ses contemporains (Pownall, Franklin, Tucker et Burke) sur la question de « gravitation » qui doit voir le centre de l'empire passer de Londres à une capitale américaine (2e partie). En 1773 Smith termine la RDN. Cependant la question américaine l'occupe pendant trois ans et tient une place importante dans la RDN. On étudie finalement les solutions d'union proposées par Smith dans son mémorandum de 1778. [eng] This paper is concerned with Smith's thoughts about american colonies. The first part studies remarks in the Lectures on Jurisprudence and the Early Draft about indians and slavery. Since 1767, the colonial conflict is the very core of debates. The paper compares Smith's ideas with those of contemporaries (Pownall, Franklin, Ticker and Burke) on the « gravitation » theory which implies that the center of the empire must move from London and cross the atlantic ocean (2d part). In the third part, the paper studies colonial matters in the Wealth of Nations and in the 1778 memorandum.

Suggested Citation

  • Hiroshi Mizuta, 1996. "Kaleidoscope of the Colonial Discussion," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 27(1), pages 57-72.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:caecpo:cep_0154-8344_1996_num_27_1_1195
    DOI: 10.3406/cep.1996.1195
    Note: DOI:10.3406/cep.1996.1195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/cep.1996.1195
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/cep_0154-8344_1996_num_27_1_1195
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/cep.1996.1195?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:caecpo:cep_0154-8344_1996_num_27_1_1195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/cep .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.