IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prj/publsh/v2y2018i3p86-93.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Study of Evaluation OECD Member Countries Based on the Enabling Trade Indexes

Author

Listed:
  • Erkan Bil

    (Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Gökçeada Vocational School)

  • Gülay Keskin

    (Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Gökçeada Vocational School)

  • Tanju Güdük

    (Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University Gökçeada Vocational School)

Abstract

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) is an intergovernmental economic organisation with 36 member countries,was established in Paris,1961. OECD aims to stimulate sustainable economic growth and improve social well-being in many of the world's most advanced countries but also emerging countries. It provides a forum in which governments can work together to share experiences and seek solutions to common problems. The Global Enabling Trade Report was first published in 2008 by the World Economic Forum. It has become a powerful tool for alliances about improving trade facilitation by focusing on the right countries and the right projects, quickly and efficiently. Co-published by the World Economic Forum and the Global Alliance for Trade Facilitation, the report features the Enabling Trade Index which measures the factors, policies and services in economies that facilitate the flow of goods over borders and to their destination. This study aims to classify OECD member countries including Turkey, based on the data of the Enabling Trade Index 2016. For the process of entering the data, Excel and the statistical software program SPSS have been used. In the process of analysing the data, cluster analysis has been used and Ward’s hierarchical clustering method has been chosen. In conclusion, the result indicates that OECD member countries generate five clusters.

Suggested Citation

  • Erkan Bil & Gülay Keskin & Tanju Güdük, 2018. "The Study of Evaluation OECD Member Countries Based on the Enabling Trade Indexes," Prizren Social Science Journal, SHIKS, vol. 2(3), pages 86-93, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:prj:publsh:v2:y:2018:i:3:p:86-93
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://prizrenjournal.com/index.php/PSSJ/article/view/68
    File Function: To View On Journal Page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://prizrenjournal.com/index.php/PSSJ/article/view/68/43
    File Function: To Download Article
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prj:publsh:v2:y:2018:i:3:p:86-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Luan Vardari (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.