IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlelg/v2006y2006i1id194p1-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Austrian Economics and the Problems of Apriorism

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Pavlik

Abstract

Any attempt at scientific justification of the validity of the a priori economics or praxeology must face the danger of vicious circles coming from the fact that any science (including Hayek's evolutionary-aprioristic theory of neuronal networks as developed in his Sensory Order) is based on some a priori presuppositions. It is Hegel's conception of the spiral movement of the "experience of consciousness" (as applied originally in his Phenomenology of Spirit) which gives an efficient method of elimination of that kind of vicious circles; being aptly re-interpreted, it even enables to defend apriorism (in its evolutionary version) face to face the developments in modern physics which resulted in Einstein's theory of relativity and quantum mechanics. Consequently, evolutionary apriorism (as utilising the inspirations from the works of Hayek, Adam Smith, Hegel, Karel Engliš, etc.) is able to present scientific arguments in favour of the categorical statement that praxeology - as an a priori proto-science - is an indispensable basis for empirical economics.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Pavlik, 2006. "Austrian Economics and the Problems of Apriorism," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2006(1), pages 1-73.
  • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlelg:v:2006:y:2006:i:1:id:194:p:1-73
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://elogos.vse.cz/artkey/elg-200601-0005_Austrian-Economics-and-the-Problems-of-Apriorism.php
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://elogos.vse.cz/pdfs/elg/2006/01/05.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Konstantin S. Khroutski, 2007. "Arousing a Dispute over BioCosmology. A Reply to Stephen Modell," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2007(1), pages 1-39.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlelg:v:2006:y:2006:i:1:id:194:p:1-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.