IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlcbr/v2022y2022i5id308p67-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agile or Traditional Project Organization: A Quantitative Assessment of Decision Criteria among Firms in the DACH Region

Author

Listed:
  • Nuria Magdalena Maier
  • Philip Emmerich

Abstract

The so-called agile approach is increasingly popular in the world of project management as a response to more dynamic and competitive environments. This study follows the question: What are the decisive criteria that result in the use of agile process models in practice? Therefore, a broad range of decision criteria is investigated, representing different reasons for firms to decide in favour or against the usage of agile process models, namely: Time-saving, increased efficiency, availability of qualified personnel, uniform terminology, project comparability and functions as a knowledge base. Most existing research on agile project management is of qualitative nature; this study uses a quantitative approach to assessing 51 firms and nine different industries within the DACH region. The collected data was analysed in a binary logistic regression model. Results reveal that time-saving positively predicts the use of agile process models, while high ratings in function as a knowledge base and project comparability predict the absence of agile process models. Therefore, practitioners are suggested to educate project and portfolio managers in the creation of hybrid environments and integration of agile process models in traditional project portfolios. Implications for Central European audience: The results of this study provide valuable insights into the selection of project management approaches across different industries in the DACH region.

Suggested Citation

  • Nuria Magdalena Maier & Philip Emmerich, 2022. "Agile or Traditional Project Organization: A Quantitative Assessment of Decision Criteria among Firms in the DACH Region," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2022(5), pages 67-83.
    • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlcbr:v:2022:y:2022:i:5:id:308:p:67-83
    DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cebr.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.cebr.308.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://cebr.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.cebr.308.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.cebr.308?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luis Emilio Alvarez-Dionisi & Rodney Turner & Mitali Mittra, 2016. "Global Project Management Trends," International Journal of Information Technology Project Management (IJITPM), IGI Global, vol. 7(3), pages 54-73, July.
    2. Carine Khalil & Sabine Khalil, 2020. "Exploring knowledge management in agile software development organizations," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 555-569, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José Magano & Cláudia Sousa Silva & Micaela Martins, 2021. "Project Management in the Biotech Context: Exploring the Interrelation between Maturity and Sustainable Project Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Gilbert Silvius & Ron Schipper, 2019. "Planning Project Stakeholder Engagement from a Sustainable Development Perspective," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-22, June.
    3. David B. Audretsch & Maksim Belitski & Rosa Caiazza & Erik E. Lehmann, 2020. "Knowledge management and entrepreneurship," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 373-385, June.
    4. Carl Marnewick & Gilbert Silvius & Ron Schipper, 2019. "Exploring Patterns of Sustainability Stimuli of Project Managers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Patricia Fuel & Manuela Pardo-del-Val & Lorenzo Revuelto-Taboada, 2022. "Does the ideal entrepreneurial team exist?," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 1263-1289, September.
    6. Evgeny N. Starikov & Marina V. Evseeva & Ilya V. Naumov, 2022. "Managing industrial growth: The role of development funds," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 13(3), pages 16-29, July.
    7. Candy Poon & Gilbert Silvius, 2020. "Factors That Stimulate Project Managers to Consider Sustainability; Exploring the Stimulus Patterns of Canadian Project Managers," Journal of Management and Sustainability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(2), pages 1-90, March.
    8. Gilbert Silvius, 2019. "Making Sense of Sustainable Project Management," Annals of Social Sciences & Management studies, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 2(4), pages 106-109, January.
    9. Giovanni Giachetti & José Luis la Vara & Beatriz Marín, 2023. "Mastering Agile Practice Adoption through a Model-Driven Approach for the Combination of Development Methods," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 65(2), pages 103-125, April.
    10. Jian Xue & Zeeshan Rasool & Aqsa Gillani & Ahmad Imran Khan, 2020. "The Impact of Project Manager Soft Competences on Project Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-18, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    agile; traditional; waterfall; project organisation; process models; decision criteria;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L23 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Organization of Production
    • L30 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - General
    • M00 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlcbr:v:2022:y:2022:i:5:id:308:p:67-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.