IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlaop/v2005y2005i5id233p86-101.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Shade of Philosophy or Kierkegaard and Spinoza
[Drobet filosofie aneb Kierkegaard a Spinoza]

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Hemelík

Abstract

The article sets out to reconstruct the Kierkegaard's critique of the demonstrations of God's existence by B. Spinoza. The Danish thinker elected the ideas of the Dutch philosopher for that reason that the spinozistic demonstrations represented the metaphysical approaches to the question of the God's existence.M. Hemelík inquires into a rightfulness of this critique and he arrives at the conclusion that Kierkegaard's critique has not the desired effect because the philosophical positions of both thinkers are absolutely different.Nevertheless the collation of Spinoza's and Kierkegaard's ideas about the God's existence is very remarkable and it contributes to the inquiry of metaphysical thinking about perfect being and being on the whole.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Hemelík, 2005. "A Shade of Philosophy or Kierkegaard and Spinoza [Drobet filosofie aneb Kierkegaard a Spinoza]," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2005(5), pages 86-101.
    • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlaop:v:2005:y:2005:i:5:id:233:p:86-101
    DOI: 10.18267/j.aop.233
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://aop.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.aop.233.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://aop.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.aop.233.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.aop.233?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlaop:v:2005:y:2005:i:5:id:233:p:86-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.