IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pmu/cjurid/v79y2019p69-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subjective And Objective Administrative Contentious. Comparative Law Aspects

Author

Listed:
  • Ximena MOLDOVAN

    (Assistant lecturer Phd., Faculty of Economics and Law, "George Emil Palade" University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology of Targu Mures; Lawyer, Mures Bar, ROMANIA)

Abstract

Following the approach of a comparative law perspective, we are able to perceive, in the doctrinal, legislative and jurisprudential evolutions of the judicial systems considered in the present study, a common tendency to unify the jurisdictions, reaching at this moment a relative uniformity of the national jurisdictional guarantees in various law systems. The regulation of the judicial procedures that involve the public administration seems, in fact, to develop and generally to converge to forms of protection that are increasingly closer to those established in disputes between private persons before the courts of common law.

Suggested Citation

  • Ximena MOLDOVAN, 2019. "Subjective And Objective Administrative Contentious. Comparative Law Aspects," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 79, pages 69-73, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:79:y:2019:p:69-73
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/curentul_juridic/rcj19/recjurid194_8F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    administrative contentious; judicial litigation body; administrative litigation body;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K23 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:79:y:2019:p:69-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bogdan Voaidas (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuttro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.