IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pmu/cjurid/v62y2015p50-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Realities And Perspectives Of Introducing The Institution Of Preliminary Chamber In The Romanian Criminal Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela Cristina VALEA

    (Associate professor, PhD., "Petru Maior" University of Tirgu Mures; lawyer, Mures Bar Association; ROMANIA.)

Abstract

The aim of the Romanian legislator to regulate a new preliminary phase of the criminal trial respectively the procedure of the preliminary chamber, was justified primarily by the infallible argument of the obligation to meet the predictability exigencies of the legal proceedings imposed by the European Convention on Human Rights, and secondly by the argument for the expediency of the criminal trial. The drafting and entry into force of a new Criminal Procedure Code was the perfect opportunity. But, like any novelty, the institution of preliminary chamber was criticized, the criticism having as a support the legislative proposal and then the final regulatory text, and also criticism made after its implementation, some of the weaknesses and shortcomings being revealed only after this point. This article covers both an overview of the regulatory procedure (the legal nature, the legislative headquarters, the object, the procedure and the resolutions, the appeal) but also a series of considerations following the analysis of certain theoretical and practical aspects.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Cristina VALEA, 2015. "Realities And Perspectives Of Introducing The Institution Of Preliminary Chamber In The Romanian Criminal Trial," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 62, pages 50-60, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:62:y:2015:p:50-60
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/curentul_juridic/rcj15/recjurid153_5F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    preliminary chamber; criminal trial; the contradiction principle; unconstitutionality; legality.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K14 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Criminal Law
    • K42 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:62:y:2015:p:50-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bogdan Voaidas (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuttro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.