IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pmu/cjurid/v58y2014p67-73.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Jurisdictional Practise Of The European Court Of Justice And Its Effect On The Administrative System Of The Member States

Author

Listed:
  • Balazs SZABO

    (Professor assistant, Department of Administrative Law, Faculty of Law , University of Miskolc, HUNGARY.)

  • Luca KUCSMA

    (Law student, University of Miskolc, Faculty of Law, HUNGARY.)

Abstract

The discretion is one of the most interesting part of not just of our legal system, but nearly in each other. Why can I stated that? In my opinion, the base and the origin of the discretion has a lot more meaning and side, not just legal. Every person’s life is a series of decisions, where we have to takes into consideration different alternatives. To choose the option for us, it is very important to analize them in certain aspects. When we are dealing with the role of discretion in the EU Adminstration System and Jurisdictional Practice, we do not make else, than just taking into consideration the EU’s and the legal acpect’s, that’s why it have to be formulated and developed from different scientific side’s also, e.g. legal, economic, social.

Suggested Citation

  • Balazs SZABO & Luca KUCSMA, 2014. "The Jurisdictional Practise Of The European Court Of Justice And Its Effect On The Administrative System Of The Member States," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 58, pages 67-73, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:58:y:2014:p:67-73
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/curentul_juridic/rcj14/recjurid143_6F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    EU – discretion – autonomy – Court of Justice – free movement – administrative system;

    JEL classification:

    • K23 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:58:y:2014:p:67-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bogdan Voaidas (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuttro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.