IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pmu/cjurid/v58y2014p50-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Participationin Administrative Procedures: Possibilities And Recent Developments In Hungary

Author

Listed:
  • Krisztina ROZSNYAI

    (PhD, mag. rer. publ.; assistant professor at the Department of Administrative Law of the Eotvos Lorand University (ELTE), Budapest, HUNGARY.)

Abstract

Administrative cases have reached a complexity which has not been seen before. Great efforts are demanded to strike an appropriate balance between the rights and interests of those directly affected by the administrative decisions and the protection of the interests of the community. There are multiple aspects that have to be taken into account when deciding administrative cases. The use of uncertain notions and the margin of appreciation of the administration are growing. This leads to the proceduralization of administrative law, as procedural rules can only guarantee the optimal decision in such situations. This development leads to enforceable procedural rights safeguarded by courts. The paper focuses on the development of one of these rights: public participation. After presenting its sources on European and international level, it shows what effects these had on the Hungarian legal setting. The interactions of the legislator and the courts are than analysed and set into the context of ECJ’s recent case-law. The analysis of court decisions shows that the judiciary is able to defend public participation even against the legislation. The role of the ECJ as ultimate safeguard is obvious in this scenario. Its case law does not only have impact on concrete cases but can even alter traditional national legal settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Krisztina ROZSNYAI, 2014. "Public Participationin Administrative Procedures: Possibilities And Recent Developments In Hungary," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 58, pages 50-66, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:58:y:2014:p:50-66
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/curentul_juridic/rcj14/recjurid143_5F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    access to justice; administrative procedure; judicial review; public participation; right to good administration; standing (in administrative litigation);
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K40 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - General
    • K32 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Energy, Environmental, Health, and Safety Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:58:y:2014:p:50-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bogdan Voaidas (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuttro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.