IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pmu/cjurid/v47y2011p247-252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dissemination Of Criminal Judgments In Written Or Audiovisual Media, Communication Tool Of Justice With Civil Society

Author

Listed:
  • Aurelian Olimpiu SABAU POP

    (Lecturer univ. PhD., Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics, Law and Administrative Sciences, Tirgu Mures, ROMANIA.)

Abstract

Communication subscribes to the notion of transparency in the legal working of authorities who have to publish permanently their work. Transparency involves a mutual communication between authorities and citizens in several aspects: access to public information, transparency in the decisions take, transparency regarding the activities of the legal persons. Publishing the criminal judgments is made in the form established by the court through the written press or audiovisual or other means of audiovisual communication. The number of appearances can’t be more than 10, if the distribution is done through the written press or audiovisual. If other audiovisual media broadcasts, the duration can’t exceed 3 months. The prevention of the criminal law must be interpreted in the broader context of crime prevention through measures that should be taken involving the social, economical and juridical plans.

Suggested Citation

  • Aurelian Olimpiu SABAU POP, 2011. "Dissemination Of Criminal Judgments In Written Or Audiovisual Media, Communication Tool Of Justice With Civil Society," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 47, pages 247-252, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:47:y:2011:p:247-252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/curentul_juridic/rcj11/recjurid114_21F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    communication; civil society; criminal judgments; justice;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K14 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Criminal Law
    • K40 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - General
    • C70 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:47:y:2011:p:247-252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bogdan Voaidas (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuttro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.