IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pmu/cjurid/v42y2010p95-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Competence Of The Constitutional Court Of Romania To Settle The Constitutional Conflicts Between The Public Authorities

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela Cristina VALEA

    (Lecturer, PhD. "Petru Maior" University of Tirgu-Mures, Faculty of Economics, Law and Administrative Sciences, ROMANIA)

Abstract

The competence of the Constitutional Court of Romania to settle constitutional conflicts between public authorities has generated and is still generating numerous debates and analyses due to both theoretical as well as practical implications. Although initially such an attribute was considered for the Constitutional Court of Romania, finally it was not included in the competence area of the constitutional jurisdictional authority as regulated by the 1991 Romanian Constitution. However, it seems that such a competence for a constitutional court is required for a balanced functioning of a relatively “young” democratic system; consequently, starting with 2003 we find it among the attributes of this body. This paper approaches several aspects related to the application of this attribute and the implied consequences.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Cristina VALEA, 2010. "The Competence Of The Constitutional Court Of Romania To Settle The Constitutional Conflicts Between The Public Authorities," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 42, pages 95-102, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:42:y:2010:p:95-102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/curentul_juridic/rcj10/recjurid103_8F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Constitutional Court; constitutional conflict; conflicts of competence; public authorities; institutional deadlock;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K10 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - General (Constitutional Law)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:42:y:2010:p:95-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bogdan Voaidas (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuttro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.