IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pmu/cjurid/v40y2010p41-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La Politique Penale Commune Dans L’Union Europeenne Par La Voie De L’Harmonisation Des Peines

Author

Listed:
  • Dragos CHILEA

    (Universite "Petru Maior",Targu Mures, Roumanie)

Abstract

One of EU objectives is to offer citizens a high level of protection within a space of freedom, security and justice. Gobally, criminality has increased considerably, especially after 1955. In France, criminality falling under the competence of the police is still on a high level, while the one falling under courts’ jurisdiction has increased. In England, the crimes recorded by the police and notified by the Homme Office have increased over the last years. In Sweden criminality is continuously raising. In Switzerland and Japan criminality is considered to be moderate. It is obvious that these criminality trends – most of the time dramatic- couldn’t have left the legislators insensible. As regards strenghtening the measures to fight against terrorism it is obvious that strict ones are being implemented at present.

Suggested Citation

  • Dragos CHILEA, 2010. "La Politique Penale Commune Dans L’Union Europeenne Par La Voie De L’Harmonisation Des Peines," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 40, pages 41-53, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:40:y:2010:p:41-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/curentul_juridic/rcj10/recjurid101_4F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    criminality; protection; crimes; community criminal politics;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K14 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Criminal Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:40:y:2010:p:41-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bogdan Voaidas (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuttro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.