IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/ppat00/1002590.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Problem of Auto-Correlation in Parasitology

Author

Listed:
  • Laura C Pollitt
  • Sarah E Reece
  • Nicole Mideo
  • Daniel H Nussey
  • Nick Colegrave

Abstract

Explaining the contribution of host and pathogen factors in driving infection dynamics is a major ambition in parasitology. There is increasing recognition that analyses based on single summary measures of an infection (e.g., peak parasitaemia) do not adequately capture infection dynamics and so, the appropriate use of statistical techniques to analyse dynamics is necessary to understand infections and, ultimately, control parasites. However, the complexities of within-host environments mean that tracking and analysing pathogen dynamics within infections and among hosts poses considerable statistical challenges. Simple statistical models make assumptions that will rarely be satisfied in data collected on host and parasite parameters. In particular, model residuals (unexplained variance in the data) should not be correlated in time or space. Here we demonstrate how failure to account for such correlations can result in incorrect biological inference from statistical analysis. We then show how mixed effects models can be used as a powerful tool to analyse such repeated measures data in the hope that this will encourage better statistical practices in parasitology.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura C Pollitt & Sarah E Reece & Nicole Mideo & Daniel H Nussey & Nick Colegrave, 2012. "The Problem of Auto-Correlation in Parasitology," PLOS Pathogens, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-4, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:ppat00:1002590
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002590
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1002590
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1002590&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002590?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Crispin Y Jordan, 2018. "Population sampling affects pseudoreplication," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-3, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:ppat00:1002590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plospathogens (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.