IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0266668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Respiratory symptoms and use of dust-control measures in New Zealand construction workers – A cross-sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel Keer
  • Collin Brooks
  • Bill Glass
  • Dave McLean
  • Elizabeth Harding
  • Jeroen Douwes

Abstract

Dust-exposed construction workers have an increased risk of respiratory symptoms, but the efficacy of dust-control measures remains unclear. This study compared respiratory symptoms, using a modified European Community Respiratory Health Survey questionnaire, between construction workers (n = 208) and a reference group of bus drivers and retail workers (n = 142). Within the construction workers, we assessed the effect of collective (on-tool vacuum/’wet-cut’ systems) and personal (respirators) exposure controls on symptom prevalence. Logistic regression assessed differences between groups, adjusted for age, ethnicity, and smoking status. Construction workers were more likely to cough with phlegm at least once a week (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.2–4.7) and cough with phlegm ≥3 months/year for ≥2 years (OR 2.8, CI 1.2–7.0), but they had similar or fewer asthma symptoms. Construction workers who had worked for 11–20 years reported more cough/phlegm symptoms (OR 5.1, 1.7–15.0 for cough with phlegm ≥3 months/year for ≥2 years) than those who had worked 10 years. Use of collective dust exposure controls might protect against these symptoms, but this requires confirmation in a larger study.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel Keer & Collin Brooks & Bill Glass & Dave McLean & Elizabeth Harding & Jeroen Douwes, 2022. "Respiratory symptoms and use of dust-control measures in New Zealand construction workers – A cross-sectional study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-12, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0266668
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0266668
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0266668&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0266668?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0266668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.