IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0266592.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors associated with cervical cancer screening among women aged 25–60 years in Lao People’s Democratic Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Jom Phaiphichit
  • Phimpha Paboriboune
  • Sengchan Kunnavong
  • Phetsavanh Chanthavilay

Abstract

Background: Despite cervical cancer being a major public health concern in the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Lao PDR), screening coverage is very low. The reasons and factors for this are unknown. This study aimed to identify factors associated with uptake of cervical cancer screening among women aged 25–60 years. Methods: The case-control study was conducted among women aged 25–60 years in Vientiane Capital and Luang Prabang province from March 15 to May 31, 2018. A total of 360 women were included in the study, a ratio of two controls per case. The cases were women who had undergone cervical cancer screening over the last five years. The controls were women who had never been screened or screened more than five years before, matched to the cases with residency and age (± five years). The cases were selected from central and provincial hospitals and the controls from the same community and districts where the cases resided. Conditional logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with cervical cancer screening. Results: The mean age was 42.37±9.4 years (range: 25–60), 66.67% were women from Vientiane Capital, and 86.11% were married. The common reasons for not being screened were the absence of clinical signs and symptoms (45.28%) followed by never having heard about cervical cancer (13.33%). In the multivariable analyses, we found that having sexually transmitted infections (AOR = 3.93; 95% CI = 1.92–8.05), receiving recommendations for screening from health workers (AOR = 3.85; 95% CI = 1.90–7.78), a high score for knowledge (AOR = 7.90; 95% CI = 2.43–25.69) and attitude towards cervical cancer prevention and treatment (AOR = 2.26; 95% CI = 1.18–7.16), and having a car to travel (AOR = 2.97; 95% CI = 1.44–6.11) had a positive impact on undergoing cervical cancer screening. Conclusion: Gynecological consultations, increased knowledge and positive attitudes result in women undergoing screening. Therefore, health education and advocacy for cervical cancer prevention should be provided to women.

Suggested Citation

  • Jom Phaiphichit & Phimpha Paboriboune & Sengchan Kunnavong & Phetsavanh Chanthavilay, 2022. "Factors associated with cervical cancer screening among women aged 25–60 years in Lao People’s Democratic Republic," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-11, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0266592
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266592
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0266592
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0266592&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0266592?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0266592. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.