IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0266148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Facemasks: Perceptions and use in an ED population during COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Vidya Eswaran
  • Anna Marie Chang
  • R Gentry Wilkerson
  • Kelli N O’Laughlin
  • Brian Chinnock
  • Stephanie A Eucker
  • Brigitte M Baumann
  • Nancy Anaya
  • Daniel G Miller
  • Adrianne N Haggins
  • Jesus R Torres
  • Erik S Anderson
  • Stephen C Lim
  • Martina T Caldwell
  • Ali S Raja
  • Robert M Rodriguez
  • The REVVED-UP Investigators

Abstract

Study objective: Facemask use is associated with reduced transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Most surveys assessing perceptions and practices of mask use miss the most vulnerable racial, ethnic, and socio-economic populations. These same populations have suffered disproportionate impacts from the pandemic. The purpose of this study was to assess beliefs, access, and practices of mask wearing across 15 urban emergency department (ED) populations. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study of ED patients from December 2020 to March 2021 at 15 geographically diverse, safety net EDs across the US. The primary outcome was frequency of mask use outside the home and around others. Other outcome measures included having enough masks and difficulty obtaining them. Results: Of 2,575 patients approached, 2,301 (89%) agreed to participate; nine had missing data pertaining to the primary outcome, leaving 2,292 included in the final analysis. A total of 79% of respondents reported wearing masks “all of the time” and 96% reported wearing masks over half the time. Subjects with PCPs were more likely to report wearing masks over half the time compared to those without PCPs (97% vs 92%). Individuals experiencing homelessness were less likely to wear a mask over half the time compared to those who were housed (81% vs 96%). Conclusions: Study participants reported high rates of facemask use. Respondents who did not have PCPs and those who were homeless were less likely to report wearing a mask over half the time and more likely to report barriers in obtaining masks. The ED may serve a critical role in education regarding, and provision of, masks for vulnerable populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Vidya Eswaran & Anna Marie Chang & R Gentry Wilkerson & Kelli N O’Laughlin & Brian Chinnock & Stephanie A Eucker & Brigitte M Baumann & Nancy Anaya & Daniel G Miller & Adrianne N Haggins & Jesus R Tor, 2022. "Facemasks: Perceptions and use in an ED population during COVID-19," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-10, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0266148
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266148
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0266148
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0266148&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0266148?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0266148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.