IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0265646.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use and perceptions on reusable and non-reusable menstrual products in Spain: A mixed-methods study

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Medina-Perucha
  • Tomàs López-Jiménez
  • Anna Sofie Holst
  • Constanza Jacques-Aviñó
  • Jordina Munrós-Feliu
  • Cristina Martínez-Bueno
  • Carme Valls-Llobet
  • Diana Pinzón Sanabria
  • Mª Mercedes Vicente-Hernández
  • Anna Berenguera

Abstract

Background: Menstrual products are necessary goods for women and people who menstruate to manage menstruation. Understanding the use and perceptions of menstrual products is key to promote menstrual equity and menstrual health. This study aimed at assessing the use and perceptions on menstrual products among women and people who menstruate aged 18–55 in Spain. Methods: A mixed-methods study was conducted, including a cross-sectional study (N = 22,823), and a qualitative study (N = 34). Results: Participants used a combination of products. Non-reusable products were the most used, while over half used reusable products. Usage changed when data were stratified by age, gender identification, completed education, country of birth and experiencing financial issues. It also varied between trans and cis participants. Menstrual products’ use also shifted based on experiences of menstrual poverty and access to information and products. Overall, reusable products were perceived to be more acceptable than non-reusable. Barriers to use the menstrual cup were also identified, including experiences of menstrual inequity (e.g., menstrual poverty, lack of access to information or menstrual management facilities). Conclusion: Perceptions and choices of menstrual products need to be acknowledged, especially when designing and implementing menstrual policies to address menstrual inequity and menstrual health.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Medina-Perucha & Tomàs López-Jiménez & Anna Sofie Holst & Constanza Jacques-Aviñó & Jordina Munrós-Feliu & Cristina Martínez-Bueno & Carme Valls-Llobet & Diana Pinzón Sanabria & Mª Mercedes Vice, 2022. "Use and perceptions on reusable and non-reusable menstrual products in Spain: A mixed-methods study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0265646
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265646
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0265646
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0265646&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0265646?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anna Maria van Eijk & Naduni Jayasinghe & Garazi Zulaika & Linda Mason & Muthusamy Sivakami & Holger W Unger & Penelope A Phillips-Howard, 2021. "Exploring menstrual products: A systematic review and meta-analysis of reusable menstrual pads for public health internationally," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Tanya Mahajan, 2019. "Imperfect Information in Menstrual Health and the Role of Informed Choice," Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Centre for Women's Development Studies, vol. 26(1-2), pages 59-78, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laura Rossouw & Hana Ross, 2021. "Understanding Period Poverty: Socio-Economic Inequalities in Menstrual Hygiene Management in Eight Low- and Middle-Income Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Supriya Garikipati & Penelope A. Phillips-Howard, 2022. "Information, Choice and Menstrual Outcomes: Evidence from a CommunityBased Intervention in Indi," Working Papers 202211, University of Liverpool, Department of Economics.
    3. Annie D. Smith & Alfred Muli & Kellogg J. Schwab & Julie Hennegan, 2020. "National Monitoring for Menstrual Health and Hygiene: Is the Type of Menstrual Material Used Indicative of Needs Across 10 Countries?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Supriya Garikipati, 2020. "Asymmetric Information in Menstrual Health and Implications for Sustainability: Insights from India," Working Papers 202015, University of Liverpool, Department of Economics.
    5. Punita Bhatt & Supriya Garikipati, 2021. "Culture, Collectivism and Empowerment: The Role of Feminist Ideologies in Women’s Work and Organization," Working Papers 202108, University of Liverpool, Department of Economics.
    6. Supriya Garikipati & Penelope A. Phillips-Howard, 2021. "What’s the Bleeding Problem? Period Poverty, Information Failure and Consumer Preferences in the Global South," Working Papers 202107, University of Liverpool, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0265646. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.