IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0265469.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Calculating and comparing codon usage values in rare disease genes highlights codon clustering with disease-and tissue- specific hierarchy

Author

Listed:
  • Rachele Rossi
  • Mingyan Fang
  • Lin Zhu
  • Chongyi Jiang
  • Cong Yu
  • Cristina Flesia
  • Chao Nie
  • Wenyan Li
  • Alessandra Ferlini

Abstract

We designed a novel strategy to define codon usage bias (CUB) in 6 specific small cohorts of human genes. We calculated codon usage (CU) values in 29 non-disease-causing (NDC) and 31 disease-causing (DC) human genes which are highly expressed in 3 distinct tissues, kidney, muscle, and skin. We applied our strategy to the same selected genes annotated in 15 mammalian species. We obtained CUB hierarchical clusters for each gene cohort which showed tissue-specific and disease-specific CUB fingerprints. We showed that DC genes (especially those expressed in muscle) display a low CUB, well recognizable in codon hierarchical clustering. We defined the extremely biased codons as “zero codons” and found that their number is significantly higher in all DC genes, all tissues, and that this trend is conserved across mammals. Based on this calculation in different gene cohorts, we identified 5 codons which are more differentially used across genes and mammals, underlining that some genes have favorite synonymous codons in use. Since of the muscle genes clear clusters, and, among these, dystrophin gene surprisingly does not show any “zero codon” we adopted a novel approach to study CUB, we called “mapping-on-codons”. We positioned 2828 dystrophin missense and nonsense pathogenic variations on their respective codon, highlighting that its frequency and occurrence is not dependent on the CU values. We conclude our strategy consents to identify a hierarchical clustering of CU values in a gene cohort-specific fingerprints, with recognizable trend across mammals. In DC muscle genes also a disease-related fingerprint can be observed, allowing discrimination between DC and NDC genes. We propose that using our strategy which studies CU in specific gene cohorts, as rare disease genes, and tissue specific genes, may provide novel information about the CUB role in human and medical genetics, with implications on synonymous variations interpretation and codon optimization algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachele Rossi & Mingyan Fang & Lin Zhu & Chongyi Jiang & Cong Yu & Cristina Flesia & Chao Nie & Wenyan Li & Alessandra Ferlini, 2022. "Calculating and comparing codon usage values in rare disease genes highlights codon clustering with disease-and tissue- specific hierarchy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-25, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0265469
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265469
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0265469
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0265469&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0265469?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yao Xu & Peijun Ma & Premal Shah & Antonis Rokas & Yi Liu & Carl Hirschie Johnson, 2013. "Non-optimal codon usage is a mechanism to achieve circadian clock conditionality," Nature, Nature, vol. 495(7439), pages 116-120, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0265469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.