IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0253126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors associated with births protected against neonatal tetanus in Africa: Evidences from Demographic and health surveys of five African countries

Author

Listed:
  • Yigizie Yeshaw
  • Tadeg Jemere
  • Henok Dagne
  • Zewudu Andualem
  • Yonas Akalu
  • Reta Dewau
  • Achamyeleh Birhanu Teshale
  • Getayeneh Antehunegn Tesema
  • Baye Dagnew

Abstract

Introduction: Maternal and neonatal tetanus remains a global public health problem affecting mainly the poorest and most marginalized subpopulations. In spite of the problem, studies conducted on the associated factors of births protected against neonatal tetanus are scarce in Africa. Therefore, this study aimed to identify both individual and community-level factors associated with births protected against neonatal tetanus in the region. Methods: The most recent Demographic and Health Survey datasets of five African countries (Ethiopia, Burundi, Comoros, Zimbabwe and Zambia) were used to investigate the associated factors of births protected from neonatal tetanus. STATA Version 14 statistical software was used for the analysis. The data were weighted before doing any statistical analysis and deviance was used for model comparison. Multilevel binary logistic regression was used to identify the associated factors of births protected against neonatal tetanus. Finally, the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated for each potential factors included in the multivariable multilevel logistic regression model. Results: A total weighted sample of 30897 reproductive age women who had a birth within 5 years preceding the survey were included in the analysis. Those women with age of 20–34 (AOR = 1.32, 95%CI: 1.18–1.48) and 35–49 years (AOR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.10–1.44), high community level of women education (AOR = 1.13, 95%CI: 1.04–1.23), being from poorer(AOR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.14–1.33), middle (AOR = 1.31, 95%CI: 1.21–1.43), richer (AOR = 1.21, 95%CI: 1.11–1.32) and richest households (AOR = 1.59, 95%CI: 1.44–1.74), having antenatal care follow up (AOR = 9.62, 95% CI: 8.79–10.54), not perceiving distance to health facility as a big problem (AOR = 1.18, 95% CI: (1.11–1.25) had higher odds of having births protected against neonatal tetanus. Conclusion: Both individual and community level factors were found to be associated with births protected against neonatal tetanus in Africa. This suggests that a variety of factors are affecting births protected against neonatal tetanus in the region. Hence, the impact of these factors should be recognized while developing strategies to reduce neonatal tetanus in the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Yigizie Yeshaw & Tadeg Jemere & Henok Dagne & Zewudu Andualem & Yonas Akalu & Reta Dewau & Achamyeleh Birhanu Teshale & Getayeneh Antehunegn Tesema & Baye Dagnew, 2021. "Factors associated with births protected against neonatal tetanus in Africa: Evidences from Demographic and health surveys of five African countries," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-11, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0253126
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0253126
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0253126&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0253126?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0253126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.