IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0252217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Duration of SARS-CoV-2 shedding: A population-based, Canadian study

Author

Listed:
  • Susan P Phillips
  • Xuejiao Wei
  • Jeffrey C Kwong
  • Jonathan Gubbay
  • Kevin L Schwartz
  • Anna Majury
  • Patti A Groome

Abstract

Introduction: There is an evidence gap regarding the duration of SARS-CoV-2 shedding and of its variability across different care settings and by age, sex, income, and co-morbidities. Such evidence is part of understanding of infectivity and reinfection. We examine direct measures of viral shedding using a linked population-based health administrative dataset. Methods: Laboratory and sociodemographic databases for Ontario, Canada were linked to identify those testing positive (RT-PCR) between Jan. 15 and April 30, 2020 who underwent subsequent testing by May 31, 2020. To maximise use of available data, we computed two shedding duration estimates defined as the time between initial positive and most recent positive (documented shedding) or second of two negative tests (documented resolution). We also report multivariable results using quantile regression to examine subgroup differences. Results: In Ontario, of the 16,595 who tested positive before April 30, 2020, 6604 had sufficient subsequent testing to allow shedding duration calculation. Documented shedding median duration calculated in 4,889 (29% of 16,595) patients was 19 days (IQR 12–28). Documented resolution median duration calculated in 3,219 (19% of the 16,595) patients was 25 days (IQR 18–34). Long-term care residents had 3–5 day longer shedding durations using both definitions. Shorter documented shedding durations of 2–4 days were observed in those living in higher income neighbourhoods. Shorter documented resolution durations of 2–3 days were observed at the 25th% of the distribution in those aged 20–49. Only 11.5% of those with definitive negative test results reverted to negative status by day 14. Conclusions: Viral shedding continued well beyond 14 days among this large subset of a population-based group with COVID-19, and longer still for long-term care residents and those living in less affluent neighborhoods. Our findings do not speak to duration of infectivity but are useful for understanding the expected duration of RT-PCR positivity and for identifying reinfection.

Suggested Citation

  • Susan P Phillips & Xuejiao Wei & Jeffrey C Kwong & Jonathan Gubbay & Kevin L Schwartz & Anna Majury & Patti A Groome, 2021. "Duration of SARS-CoV-2 shedding: A population-based, Canadian study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0252217
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0252217
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0252217&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0252217?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0252217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.