IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0247244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The development and validation of a resource consumption score of an emergency department consultation

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Müller
  • Clyde B Schechter
  • Wolf E Hautz
  • Thomas C Sauter
  • Aristomenis K Exadaktylos
  • Stephanie Stock
  • Tanja Birrenbach

Abstract

Background: Emergency Department (ED) visits and health care costs are increasing globally, but little is known about contributing factors of ED resource consumption. This study aims to analyse and to predict the total ED resource consumption out of the patient and consultation characteristics in order to execute performance analysis and evaluate quality improvements. Methods: Characteristics of ED visits of a large Swiss university hospital were summarized according to acute patient condition factors (e.g. chief complaint, resuscitation bay use, vital parameter deviations), chronic patient conditions (e.g. age, comorbidities, drug intake), and contextual factors (e.g. night-time admission). Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were conducted with the total ED resource consumption as the dependent variable. Results: In total, 164,729 visits were included in the analysis. Physician resources accounted for the largest proportion (54.8%), followed by radiology (19.2%), and laboratory work-up (16.2%). In the multivariable final model, chief complaint had the highest impact on the total ED resource consumption, followed by resuscitation bay use and admission by ambulance. The impact of age group was small. The multivariable final model was validated (R2 of 0.54) and a scoring system was derived out of the predictors. Conclusions: More than half of the variation in total ED resource consumption can be predicted by our suggested model in the internal validation, but further studies are needed for external validation. The score developed can be used to calculate benchmarks of an ED and provides leaders in emergency care with a tool that allows them to evaluate resource decisions and to estimate effects of organizational changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Müller & Clyde B Schechter & Wolf E Hautz & Thomas C Sauter & Aristomenis K Exadaktylos & Stephanie Stock & Tanja Birrenbach, 2021. "The development and validation of a resource consumption score of an emergency department consultation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0247244
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0247244
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0247244&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0247244?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stephanie Radtke & Gian-Luca Trepp & Martin Müller & Aristomenis K. Exadaktylos & Jolanta Klukowska-Rötzler, 2021. "Floorball Injuries Presenting to a Swiss Adult Emergency Department: A Retrospective Study (2013–2019)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Lara Aurora Brockhus & Martina Bärtsch & Aristomenis K. Exadaktylos & Kristina Keitel & Jolanta Klukowska-Rötzler & Martin Müller, 2021. "Clinical Presentations of Adolescents Aged 16–18 Years in the Adult Emergency Department," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-10, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0247244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.