IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0240661.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stereoscopic 3D geometric distortions analyzed from the viewer’s point of view

Author

Listed:
  • Zhongpai Gao
  • Guangtao Zhai
  • Xiaokang Yang

Abstract

Stereoscopic 3D (S3D) geometric distortions can be introduced by mismatches among image capture, display, and viewing configurations. In previous work of S3D geometric models, geometric distortions have been analyzed from a third-person perspective based on the binocular depth cue (i.e., binocular disparity). A third-person perspective is different from what the viewer sees since monocular depth cues (e.g., linear perspective, occlusion, and shadows) from different perspectives are different. However, depth perception in a 3D space involves both monocular and binocular depth cues. Geometric distortions that are solely predicted by the binocular depth cue cannot describe what a viewer really perceives. In this paper, we combine geometric models and retinal disparity models to analyze geometric distortions from the viewer’s perspective where both monocular and binocular depth cues are considered. Results show that binocular and monocular depth-cue conflicts in a geometrically distorted S3D space. Moreover, user-initiated head translations averting from the optimal viewing position in conventional S3D displays can also introduce geometric distortions, which are inconsistent with our natural 3D viewing condition. The inconsistency of depth cues in a dynamic scene may be a source of visually induced motions sickness.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhongpai Gao & Guangtao Zhai & Xiaokang Yang, 2020. "Stereoscopic 3D geometric distortions analyzed from the viewer’s point of view," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0240661
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0240661
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0240661&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0240661?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0240661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.