IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0238065.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical Analytics Prediction Engine (CAPE): Development, electronic health record integration and prospective validation of hospital mortality, 180-day mortality and 30-day readmission risk prediction models

Author

Listed:
  • Nirav Shah
  • Chad Konchak
  • Daniel Chertok
  • Loretta Au
  • Alex Kozlov
  • Urmila Ravichandran
  • Patrick McNulty
  • Linning Liao
  • Kate Steele
  • Maureen Kharasch
  • Chris Boyle
  • Tom Hensing
  • David Lovinger
  • Jonathan Birnberg
  • Anthony Solomonides
  • Lakshmi Halasyamani

Abstract

Background: Numerous predictive models in the literature stratify patients by risk of mortality and readmission. Few prediction models have been developed to optimize impact while sustaining sufficient performance. Objective: We aimed to derive models for hospital mortality, 180-day mortality and 30-day readmission, implement these models within our electronic health record and prospectively validate these models for use across an entire health system. Materials & methods: We developed, integrated into our electronic health record and prospectively validated three predictive models using logistic regression from data collected from patients 18 to 99 years old who had an inpatient or observation admission at NorthShore University HealthSystem, a four-hospital integrated system in the United States, from January 2012 to September 2018. We analyzed the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for model performance. Results: Models were derived and validated at three time points: retrospective, prospective at discharge, and prospective at 4 hours after presentation. AUCs of hospital mortality were 0.91, 0.89 and 0.77, respectively. AUCs for 30-day readmission were 0.71, 0.71 and 0.69, respectively. 180-day mortality models were only retrospectively validated with an AUC of 0.85. Discussion: We were able to retain good model performance while optimizing potential model impact by also valuing model derivation efficiency, usability, sensitivity, generalizability and ability to prescribe timely interventions to reduce underlying risk. Measuring model impact by tying prediction models to interventions that are then rapidly tested will establish a path for meaningful clinical improvement and implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Nirav Shah & Chad Konchak & Daniel Chertok & Loretta Au & Alex Kozlov & Urmila Ravichandran & Patrick McNulty & Linning Liao & Kate Steele & Maureen Kharasch & Chris Boyle & Tom Hensing & David Loving, 2020. "Clinical Analytics Prediction Engine (CAPE): Development, electronic health record integration and prospective validation of hospital mortality, 180-day mortality and 30-day readmission risk predictio," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0238065
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0238065
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0238065&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0238065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0238065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.