IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0237693.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hydroxychloroquine and tocilizumab therapy in COVID-19 patients—An observational study

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Ip
  • Donald A Berry
  • Eric Hansen
  • Andre H Goy
  • Andrew L Pecora
  • Brittany A Sinclaire
  • Urszula Bednarz
  • Michael Marafelias
  • Scott M Berry
  • Nicholas S Berry
  • Shivam Mathura
  • Ihor S Sawczuk
  • Noa Biran
  • Ronaldo C Go
  • Steven Sperber
  • Julia A Piwoz
  • Bindu Balani
  • Cristina Cicogna
  • Rani Sebti
  • Jerry Zuckerman
  • Keith M Rose
  • Lisa Tank
  • Laurie G Jacobs
  • Jason Korcak
  • Sarah L Timmapuri
  • Joseph P Underwood
  • Gregory Sugalski
  • Carol Barsky
  • Daniel W Varga
  • Arif Asif
  • Joseph C Landolfi
  • Stuart L Goldberg

Abstract

Hydroxychloroquine has been touted as a potential COVID-19 treatment. Tocilizumab, an inhibitor of IL-6, has also been proposed as a treatment of critically ill patients. In this retrospective observational cohort study drawn from electronic health records we sought to describe the association between mortality and hydroxychloroquine or tocilizumab therapy among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Patients were hospitalized at a 13-hospital network spanning New Jersey USA between March 1, 2020 and April 22, 2020 with positive polymerase chain reaction results for SARS-CoV-2. Follow up was through May 5, 2020. Among 2512 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 there have been 547 deaths (22%), 1539 (61%) discharges and 426 (17%) remain hospitalized. 1914 (76%) received at least one dose of hydroxychloroquine and 1473 (59%) received hydroxychloroquine with azithromycin. After adjusting for imbalances via propensity modeling, compared to receiving neither drug, there were no significant differences in associated mortality for patients receiving any hydroxychloroquine during the hospitalization (HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.80–1.22]), hydroxychloroquine alone (HR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.83–1.27]), or hydroxychloroquine with azithromycin (HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.75–1.28]). The 30-day unadjusted mortality for patients receiving hydroxychloroquine alone, azithromycin alone, the combination or neither drug was 25%, 20%, 18%, and 20%, respectively. Among 547 evaluable ICU patients, including 134 receiving tocilizumab in the ICU, an exploratory analysis found a trend towards an improved survival association with tocilizumab treatment (adjusted HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.57–1.00]), with 30 day unadjusted mortality with and without tocilizumab of 46% versus 56%. This observational cohort study suggests hydroxychloroquine, either alone or in combination with azithromycin, was not associated with a survival benefit among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Tocilizumab demonstrated a trend association towards reduced mortality among ICU patients. Our findings are limited to hospitalized patients and must be interpreted with caution while awaiting results of randomized trials.Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT04347993

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Ip & Donald A Berry & Eric Hansen & Andre H Goy & Andrew L Pecora & Brittany A Sinclaire & Urszula Bednarz & Michael Marafelias & Scott M Berry & Nicholas S Berry & Shivam Mathura & Ihor S Sawc, 2020. "Hydroxychloroquine and tocilizumab therapy in COVID-19 patients—An observational study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0237693
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237693
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0237693
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0237693&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0237693?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0237693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.