IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0236338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relative quantification of BCL2 mRNA for diagnostic usage needs stable uncontrolled genes as reference

Author

Listed:
  • Nehanjali Dwivedi
  • Sreejeta Mondal
  • Smitha P. K.
  • Sowmya T.
  • Kartik Sachdeva
  • Christopher Bathula
  • Vishnupriyan K.
  • Nataraj K. S.
  • Sharat Damodar
  • Sujan K Dhar
  • Manjula Das

Abstract

Dysregulation of BCL2 is a pathophysiology observed in haematological malignancies. For implementation of available treatment-options it is preferred to know the relative quantification of BCL2 mRNA with appropriate reference genes. For the choice of reference genes—(i) Reference Genes were selected by assessing variation of >60,000 genes from 4 RNA-seq datasets of haematological malignancies followed by filtering based on their GO biological process annotations and proximity of their chromosomal locations to known disease translocations. Selected genes were experimentally validated across various haematological malignancy samples followed by stability comparison using geNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper and RefFinder. (ii) 43 commonly used Reference Genes were obtained from literature through extensive systematic review. Levels of BCL2 mRNA was assessed by qPCR normalized either by novel reference genes from this study or GAPDH, the most cited reference gene in literature and compared. The analysis showed PTCD2, PPP1R3B and FBXW9 to be the most unregulated genes across lymph-nodes, bone marrow and PBMC samples unlike the Reference Genes used in literature. BCL2 mRNA level shows a consistent higher expression in haematological malignancy patients when normalized by these novel Reference Genes as opposed to GAPDH, the most cited Reference Gene. These reference genes should also be applicable in qPCR platforms using Taqman probes and other model systems including cell lines and rodent models. Absence of sample from healthy-normal individual in diagnostic cases call for careful selection of Reference Genes for relative quantification of a biomarker by qPCR.BCL2 can be used as molecular diagnostics only if normalized with a set of reference genes with stable yet low levels of expression across different types of haematological malignancies.

Suggested Citation

  • Nehanjali Dwivedi & Sreejeta Mondal & Smitha P. K. & Sowmya T. & Kartik Sachdeva & Christopher Bathula & Vishnupriyan K. & Nataraj K. S. & Sharat Damodar & Sujan K Dhar & Manjula Das, 2020. "Relative quantification of BCL2 mRNA for diagnostic usage needs stable uncontrolled genes as reference," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0236338
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0236338
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0236338&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0236338?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0236338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.