IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0232867.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The cost of a school based mass treatment of schistosomiasis in Ugu District, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa in 2012

Author

Listed:
  • A Maphumulo
  • O Mahomed
  • B Vennervald
  • S G Gundersen
  • M Taylor
  • E F Kjetland

Abstract

Introduction: The Neglected Tropical Diseases Roadmap of the WHO set targets for potential elimination as a “public health problem” for the period 2012–2020 in multiple countries in Africa, with the aim of global elimination of schistosomiasis as a “public health problem” by 2025. Aim: The purpose of the study was to estimate the cost from a provider’s perspective of the Department of Health’s Schistosomiasis Mass Drug Administration (MDA) in Ugu District, KwaZulu-Natal in 2012, with a view to project the costs for the entire KwaZulu Natal Province. Methods: A total of 491 public schools and 16 independent schools in Ugu District, a predominantly rural district in KwaZulu-Natal with a total of 218 242 learners, were included in the schistosomiasis control programme. They were randomly selected from schools situated below an altitude of 300 meters, where schistosomiasis is endemic. A retrospective costing study was conducted using the provider’s perspective to cost. Cost data were collected by reviewing existing records including financial statements, invoices, receipts, transport log books, equipment inventories, and information from personnel payroll, existing budget, and the staff diaries. Results: A total of 15571 children were treated in 2012, resulting in a total cost of the MDA programme of ZAR 2 137 143 and a unit cost of ZAR 137. The three main cost components were Medication Costs (37%), Human Resources Cost (36%) and Capital items (16%). Conclusions: Low coverage exacerbates the cost of the programme and makes a decision to support such a programme difficult. However, a normative costing study based on the integration of the programme within the Department of Health should be conducted.

Suggested Citation

  • A Maphumulo & O Mahomed & B Vennervald & S G Gundersen & M Taylor & E F Kjetland, 2020. "The cost of a school based mass treatment of schistosomiasis in Ugu District, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa in 2012," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-13, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0232867
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0232867
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0232867&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0232867?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jacqueline Leslie & Amadou Garba & Elisa Bosque Oliva & Arouna Barkire & Amadou Aboubacar Tinni & Ali Djibo & Idrissa Mounkaila & Alan Fenwick, 2011. "Schistosomiais and Soil-Transmitted Helminth Control in Niger: Cost Effectiveness of School Based and Community Distributed Mass Drug Administration," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(10), pages 1-11, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0232867. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.