IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0228609.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Radiation dose reduction and improvement of image quality in digital chest radiography by new spatial noise reduction algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Wonje Lee
  • Seungho Lee
  • Semin Chong
  • Kyungmin Lee
  • Jongha Lee
  • Jae Chol Choi
  • Changwon Lim

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the image quality of low-dose chest digital radiographic images obtained with a new spatial noise reduction algorithm, compared to a conventional de-noising technique. Materials and methods: In 69 patients, the dose reduction protocol was divided into A, B, and C test groups– 60% (n = 22), 50% (n = 23), and 40% (n = 24) of the baseline dose. In each patient, baseline dose radiographs were obtained with conventional image processing while low-dose images were acquired with new image processing. A set of baseline and low-dose radiographic images per patient was evaluated and scored on a 5-point scale over seven anatomical landmarks (radiolucency of unobscured lung, pulmonary vascularity, trachea, edge of rib, heart border, intervertebral disc space, and pulmonary vessels in the retrocardiac area) and three representative abnormal findings (nodule, consolidation, and interstitial marking) by two thoracic radiologists. A comparison of paired baseline and low-dose images was statistically analyzed using a non-inferiority test based on the paired t-test or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: In A, B, and C test groups, the mean dose reduction rate of the baseline radiation dose was 63.4%, 53.9%, and 47.8%, respectively. In all test groups, the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval was less than the non-inferiority margin of 0.5 every seven anatomical landmarks and three representative abnormal findings, which suggested that the image quality of the low-dose image was not inferior to that of the baseline dose image even if the maximum average dose reduction rate was reduced to 47.8% of the baseline dose. Conclusion: In our study, an image processing technique integrating a new noise reduction algorithm achieved dose reductions of approximately half without compromising image quality for abnormal lung findings and anatomical landmarks seen on chest radiographs. This feature-preserving, noise reduction algorithm adopted in the proposed engine enables a lower radiation dose boundary for the sake of patient’s and radiography technologist’s radiation safety in routine clinical practice, in compliance with regulatory guidelines.

Suggested Citation

  • Wonje Lee & Seungho Lee & Semin Chong & Kyungmin Lee & Jongha Lee & Jae Chol Choi & Changwon Lim, 2020. "Radiation dose reduction and improvement of image quality in digital chest radiography by new spatial noise reduction algorithm," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-12, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0228609
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0228609
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0228609&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0228609?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0228609. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.