IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0224200.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patients undergoing surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis experience unique courses of pain and disability: A group-based trajectory analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey J Hebert
  • Edward Abraham
  • Niels Wedderkopp
  • Erin Bigney
  • Eden Richardson
  • Mariah Darling
  • Hamilton Hall
  • Charles G Fisher
  • Y Raja Rampersaud
  • Kenneth C Thomas
  • Bradley Jacobs
  • Michael Johnson
  • Jerome Paquet
  • Najmedden Attabib
  • Peter Jarzem
  • Eugene K Wai
  • Parham Rasoulinejad
  • Henry Ahn
  • Andrew Nataraj
  • Alexandra Stratton
  • Neil Manson

Abstract

Objective: Identify patient subgroups defined by trajectories of pain and disability following surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, and investigate the construct validity of the subgroups by evaluating for meaningful differences in clinical outcomes. Methods: We recruited patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis from 13 surgical spine centers who were deemed to be surgical candidates. Study outcomes (leg and back pain numeric rating scales, modified Oswestry disability index) were measured before surgery, and after 3, 12, and 24 months. Group-based trajectory models were developed to identify trajectory subgroups for leg pain, back pain, and pain-related disability. We examined for differences in the proportion of patients achieving minimum clinically important change in pain and disability (30%) and clinical success (50% reduction in disability or Oswestry score ≤22) 12 months from surgery. Results: Data from 548 patients (mean[SD] age = 66.7[9.1] years; 46% female) were included. The models estimated 3 unique trajectories for leg pain (excellent outcome = 14.4%, good outcome = 49.5%, poor outcome = 36.1%), back pain (excellent outcome = 13.1%, good outcome = 45.0%, poor outcome = 41.9%), and disability (excellent outcome = 30.8%, fair outcome = 40.1%, poor outcome = 29.1%). The construct validity of the trajectory subgroups was confirmed by between-trajectory group differences in the proportion of patients meeting thresholds for minimum clinically important change and clinical success after 12 postoperative months (p

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey J Hebert & Edward Abraham & Niels Wedderkopp & Erin Bigney & Eden Richardson & Mariah Darling & Hamilton Hall & Charles G Fisher & Y Raja Rampersaud & Kenneth C Thomas & Bradley Jacobs & Micha, 2019. "Patients undergoing surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis experience unique courses of pain and disability: A group-based trajectory analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-14, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0224200
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0224200
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0224200&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0224200?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0224200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.